RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Alphabet’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
nominate for the next Board election at least one candidate who:
• has a high level of human and/or civil rights expertise and experience and is widely recognized as such, as reasonably determined by Alphabet’s Board, and
• will qualify as an independent director within the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

WHEREAS: Shareholders believe Alphabet requires expert, board level oversight of civil and human rights issues to assess risk and develop strategy to avoid causing or contributing to widespread violations of human or civil rights, such as supporting hate campaigns, privacy violations, or violence.

Shareholders are concerned Alphabet’s content governance has proven ineffectual and poses risk to shareholder value. Alphabet has extraordinary impact on human and civil rights, controlling an estimated 90 percent of the search market. Nearly two billion people use YouTube monthly, with YouTube’s recommendation algorithm driving approximately 70 percent of viewing.

Civil rights advocates have criticized Alphabet for failing to address hate speech that targets communities of color and marginalized groups. YouTube launched a 100 million dollar fund for black creators, yet the New York Times reports YouTube has been “successfully weaponized by racists…to undermine Black Lives Matter.” The company faces a class action lawsuit from black creators alleging Alphabet violated laws intended to prevent racial discrimination.

The Christchurch terrorist attack in New Zealand, broadcast on YouTube, led to a global call to limit the
spread of extremist content. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said: “We cannot simply sit back and accept that these platforms just exist and that what is said on them is not the responsibility of the place where they are published.” Yet, 2020 research found YouTube radicalized viewers by steering them to videos espousing increasingly extremist ideologies.

In 2019, employees — Googlers for Human Rights — petitioned Google not to support United States Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or the Office of Refugee Resettlement “until these agencies stop engaging in human rights abuses,” comparing Google’s role to IBM’s enabling Nazis during the Holocaust.

Amnesty International concluded Google’s “surveillance-based business model is incompatible with the right to privacy and poses a serious threat to a range of other human rights.” An unsealed court document revealed Google is enabling reverse search warrants to disclose everyone who searched a keyword rather than information on known suspects, a practice under challenge for violating civil rights.

In 2019, Google was fined a record 170 million dollars by the Federal Trade Commission and New York
Attorney General Letitia James over YouTube’s violation of children’s privacy. Now, a 3 billion dollar United Kingdom lawsuit alleges YouTube has “systematically broken [privacy] laws by harvesting children’s data.”

As fiduciaries, our Board is responsible for stewardship of business performance and long term strategic
planning, in light of risk factors like widespread violations of human and civil rights.

,

,