Assess Company Diversity and Inclusion Efforts

Resolution Text

WHEREAS:  Numerous studies have pointed to the corporate benefits of a diverse workforce. These include:

Despite such benefits, significant barriers exist for diverse employees advancing within their careers. Women enter the workforce in almost equal numbers as men (48%). However, they only comprise 22% of the executive suite; as a percentage of representation, this indicates a drop of 26%. Similarly, people of color comprise 33% of entry level positions, but only 13% of the c-suite.

On its website, Gilead states that inclusion is one of its five core values, writing “we know that we are stronger and more innovative at Gilead when we are informed by a diverse set of backgrounds, experiences and points of view.”  Gilead further writes that it wants “all of our employees to embrace and leverage each other’s talents and diverse perspectives, foster a sense of belonging, achieve their full career potential and contribute to Gilead’s success.”

However, Gilead does not disclose meaningful statistics that allow investors to determine the effectiveness of its human capital management as it relates to workplace diversity.  Stakeholders may become concerned that Gilead Science’s statements are corporate puffery, language described by the United States Federal Trade Commission as marketing exaggerations intended to “puff up” products and not able to be relied upon by consumers and investors.

Investor desire for information on this issue is significant. In June, 2019, $1.74 trillion in represented assets released an Investor Statement which spoke to the importance of increased corporate transparency on workplace equity data. As it stated:

It is essential that investors have access to the most up-to-date and accurate information related to diverse workplace policies, practices, and outcomes.

BE IT RESOLVED:  Shareholders request that Gilead Sciences publish annually a report assessing the Company's diversity and inclusion efforts, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information.  At a minimum the report should include:

  • the process that the Board follows for assessing the effectiveness of its diversity and inclusion programs,

  • the Board’s assessment of program effectiveness, as reflected in any goals, metrics, and trends related to its promotion, recruitment and retention of protected classes of employees.

Supporting Statement:  Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand the effectiveness of the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Lead Filer

Meredith Benton
As You Sow